A world leader in large scale
Commercial Litigation Funding.
assessment

Litigation Funding Assessment

The basic parameters of a fundable claim are that:

  • The claim should have good prospects of success against a solvent defendant; and
  • The claim value should be for a sufficient multiple of the likely costs. For example the claim should normally be worth at least 6 times the costs of pursuing it all the way through trial. As a rule of thumb, claims will need to carry a quantum of at least £3mm in order to be fundable. There are no upper limits in terms of costs or the quantum of damages.

Breaking this down a little further, each potentially investable case is assessed on a variety of factors, principally:

  • Merits – What are the strengths and weaknesses of the legal arguments and of the supporting evidence?
  • Quantum – What level of damages is likely to be achieved on success at trial or on settlement?
  • Recoverability – Is the Defendant good for the money?
  • Time – How long will it take to achieve resolution including the risk of appeal?
  • Costs – How much will the Claimant’s costs turn out to be; what is the risk of over-run; how will the adverse costs risk be dealt with?
  • Variability – How likely are each of the above factors to change?

In principle, we work with the case materials that are available. Ideally, in order properly to assess the risk, we like to see and evaluate the following items before a decision can be taken:

  • The principal documents (contracts, correspondence etc.) relied on in the case;
  • Any witness statements that have been prepared;
  • Any Court documents that have been filed;
  • A written legal opinion dealing positively with the merits;
  • A written, legally coherent justification of the quantum sought in the claim;
  • A written estimate of the costs to be incurred in pursuing the claim.

However we do recognise that, depending on the stage the preparations of the case have reached, some of these documents might not be immediately available.

Calunius Capital in the media - 2012

The third way

The Lawyer - 6 February 2012

Third party litigation funding was the topic discussed by The Lawyer’s panel this week and Calunius’ Christian Stuerwald was asked for his reaction.

Litigation funders respond to US calls for increased regulation

Edward Machin, Commercial Dispute Resolution - 3 February 2012

All hell broke loose last week in the world of litigation funding. There was a debate in the House of Lords on the Legal Aid and Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Bill which included half an hour on litigation funding. This was instigated by an extraordinary lobbying effort by none other than the US Chamber of Commerce, the mouthpiece of Global Big Business and Enemy of Access to Justice, whose main purpose in life is to preserve the inbuilt advantage in litigation held by the biggest of businesses. The US Chamber rightly perceives litigation funding and the Access to Justice that it gives to SMEs as a serious challenge to the US Chamber’s members. The Chamber’s position has stimulated a series of replies from litigation funders. Here you will find a selection starting with articles in CDR (above) and Rachel Rothwell’s article in Law Society Gazette (below). A copy of the Parliamentary Briefing prepared by the Association of Litigation Funders of England & Wales can also be found below.

Storm raging over investing in litigation

Rachel Rothwell - Law Society Gazette - 7 February 2012

VIEW ALL NEWS ARTICLES